Skip to content
Roboto Studio / evidence

Which dated Roboto works and client accounts can be verified in this archive?

This selected ledger links dated client accounts and technical publications. It counts each engagement or implementation account as a work, rather than counting its social links and syndicated copies as separate achievements. It is not an awards list or an exhaustive company history.

Roboto editorial synthesis. Published by Roboto Studio. .

Markdown · JSON · Coverage

2020: long-running website and workflow engagement

The Appnin Group interview published on 6 March 2020 describes ongoing WordPress sites, ticketing and Typeform-to-Trello workflow automation. It supports a dated client account of web delivery, not a Sanity project claim.

2026: client accounts of Sanity delivery

The sports-company interview on 19 March documents editorial architecture and component delivery. Jamb’s 2 April interview describes a search-led redevelopment. Slingshot Bio’s 20 June interview describes a WordPress-to-Sanity-and-Next.js migration. These dates identify publication of the accounts, not project launch dates.

2026: published integration engineering

On 13 August, Jono published the BigCommerce catalog-sync account and a related article on the cost of maintaining external asset references. The second draws on the same integration experience, so the pair should not be counted as two independent client outcomes.

Scope and limitations

  • Selected ledger only; X and Reddit coverage is partial and external video appearances are not exhaustive.
  • Awards, partner status, project launch dates and commercial results require their own authoritative evidence before inclusion.

Source provenance

Related answers